The home pages remain free of any charge. We need donations or subscriptions to continue. Please pass on this website link to your family, relatives, friends and clients. |
|
Skagit River JournalSubscribers Edition The most in-depth, comprehensive site about the Skagit Covers from British Columbia to Puget Sound. Counties covered: Skagit, Whatcom, Island, San Juan, Snohomish & BC. An evolving history dedicated to committing random acts of historical kindness |
Home of the Tarheel Stomp Mortimer Cook slept here & named the town Bug |
|
He [Eldridge] served in the House in 1864, 1865, and 1866 and was Speaker in 1866. He sought to return again in 1869 but ran slightly behind the Democrat, Roeder. He challenged the seating of Roeder but his challenge failed on a 14-14 vote when one Republican, McMillan of King, voted with the Democrats. He did return to the House for one more term in 1875. Eldridge was also chairman of the Republican conventions in 1865, 1867, and 1869 which nominated Denny, Flanders, and Garfielde as candidates for Territorial delegate in Congress. In each instance the nominee was elected.
But we are assembled to protest against a form of government existing without the consent of the governed — to declare our right to be free as man is free, to be represented in the government which we are taxed to support, to have such disgraceful laws as give man the power to chastise and imprison his wife, to take the wages which she earns, the property which she inherits, and, in case of separation, the children of her love; laws which make her the mere dependent on his bounty. It is to protest against such unjust laws as these that we are assembled today, and to have them, if possible, forever erased from our statute books, deeming them a shame and a disgrace to a Christian republic in the nineteenth century. We have met to uplift woman's fallen divinity upon an even pedestal with man's. And, strange as it may seem to many, we now demand our right to vote according to the declaration of the government under which we live.In an essay called "Judge John Philo Hoyt and Suffrage in Washington Territory," Charles Wiggins addresses how Supreme Court Judge Hoyt was most controversial in the movement out here in Washington Territory and state, but in it he also told us how Eldridge ran against the Western frontier grain very early on, in 1867, joining the dean of territorial pioneers:
Suffrage advocates repeatedly pressed the territorial legislature to extend the franchise to women. A. A. Denny moved to grant women suffrage in the very first territorial legislature in 1854, but Denny's motion failed. The legislature revised the election statutes in 1867 in order to deny the franchise to former Confederate soldiers, granting the right to vote to "all white American citizens 21 years of age. . . ." Edward Eldridge stated on the floor of the territorial legislature that this law granted to women the right to vote. Eldridge, a delegate to the 1889 convention, was perhaps the most vigorous advocate for placing women's suffrage in the Washington constitution.Although Speaker Eldridge was thwarted in his efforts back in 1867, he kept pressing for suffrage and someone apparently followed the old tradition in American politics: you can sometimes defeat your opponent about one idea or subject by sewing the seed of distrust with an unrelated personal controversy. That occurred in 1873 when someone spread the story of Eldridge's name change and added to it the charge that he did so to hide some dark secret or transgression in his past. T. A. Larson wrote in "Dolls, Vassals, and Drudges — Pioneer Women in the West" in the January 1972 edition of Western Historical Quarterly, "Edward Eldridge seems to have been unique when he argued in the Washington legislature in 1873 about the imminent disappearance of the frontier made woman . . . " The legislature spent much of one whole day in that session, addressing the matter of Eldridge's name change; and Donna Sand discovered how Eldridge put out that specific fire by filing an official application for name change.
Mr. Eldridge's Reply Whatcom, April 3,1878.
Editor, Bellingham Bay Mail
Dear Sir:
As two communications have recently appeared in the Democratic Press, published at Port Townsend, written by two residents of this County, personal enemies of my own, for the purpose of prejudicing the public against me at the coming election; and as it is doubtful whether my reply thereto will reach the same paper in time for effective publication before the election, I would thank you to give this a place in your columns so that those who can may see it and judge for themselves.
The only allusion I will make to the first article, as to the statement that I ran behind the head of my ticket over a hundred votes at the last election, is that the writer did not state that there were three candidates in the field for Treasurer and only two for Congress. I was defeated by five votes, the result of my own apathy and the base falsehoods circulated by these same writers just before the election, when it was too late for me to hear of and contradict them. Had I been as anxious for the office as is represented I would have had little trouble in getting it.
The second article contains more malignant matter and assassin-like was kept back until it was beyond my power to prevent its results. No person who is thoroughly acquainted with me would believe for a moment that I would pen such a silly, childish expression to a member of a Legislature as is ascribed to me; namely, that if this county was divided, I would never again be able to get an office and therefore must not be done. If I had no more sense than to write that, then I have not sense enough to fill any office. I pronounce it false and call for the publication of the letter if true.
The statement is made that I was once charged in California with robbing sluices, and that I left suddenly. No facts are stated; but the inference is drawn that I was guilty and fled to escape detection. Years have elapsed since that statement was first made here, but with all that time for investigation, nothing more is stated. Since my accusers cannot or will not give the facts in the case I will do it for them.
Over twenty-five years ago I was charged, by a person who had the same feelings toward me that these writers have, with having taken gold from my own sluice after it has been attached. The charge was presented to the grand jury, examined info by them, and the charge was dismissed. This can be proven by the records of the court of sessions of Siskiyou County, California. My enemies could have stated that, had they wished to, but that was not their object. Another item I will inform them of: one of those grand jurors is now and has been for years a resident of this county, and he can inform the public whether I left suddenly or not, or whether there was any necessity for my leaving until it suited my pleasure and convenience to do so.
As for my name, no man ever knew me by the name of Munro in America. I stated to the Legislature referred to when and where and why I changed my name, and so well satisfied were they of the truth of my statement that the bill asked for passed both Houses without a dissenting voice within half an hour of its introduction, although three-fourths of the members were my political opponents.
As for my seeking this office, I would not have been a candidate but for the request of some of the prominent men in the county; and the fact that the county convention instructed their delegates to use all their influence to procure my nomination as delegate at large is proof whether my neighbors consider me a fraud or not.
Were I as selfish and as fond of office as is represented I would be differently situated to what I am to-day; but gold is not my goal, and I prefer earning my bread by the sweat of my brown, and being my own master, to being the tool of any man, or set of men. Signed, E. Eldridge
Thus far, we have not found any other public utterance or writing by Eldridge regarding his name change or the reason for it, but we are still researching.Port Townsend Democratic Press, March 29, 1878 To: Editor, Democratic Press, March 20, 1878
The Seattle Intelligencer of March 2d, in speaking of the [Republican, proposed State Constitution] convention and its nominees, says, "We see no reason why Eldridge should not poll the party vote." It will be the business of this paper to show why, or at least a few of the many reasons why, he should not. . . .
Who is this our Caesar and on what meat hath he fed, that he has grown so great? The first account we have of him, he was sailing on the [Great] Lakes, before the mast, and was known as Alexander Monroe. The next time we hear of him was near Yreka, Cal., where he figures as defendant in a suit entitled State of California vs. E. Eldridge. Charge, Robbing Sluices! Any one who has ever been in a mining camp knows the character of a man must bear to be even suspected of such an offense. Our information is, that he left there very suddenly and stood not upon the order of his going. Who wishes to have it said that one of the three delegates at large is a man who has been charged with sluice robbing.
The next we know of him he turns up at Bellingham Bay, and still known as Eldridge! and he now begins to dabble in politics and was once elected to the legislature as a Democrat, and continued to act with them until about 1862, when he changed his politics one day and came out a Republican candidate for the Legislature! and by the influence of the [Sehome] Coal Company (a prominent factor in the local politics,) made his election sure. He hung on to the company and was elected two or three times, and when, finally, the people made a determined effort and threw him overboard, he contested the election and moved heaven and earth to reverse the will of the people and keep his place at the public crib.
He was elected once again and the principal measure of his was to log-roll a bill to change and legalize his name! Now the point is this: if his name was Eldridge he wanted no law to declare it so, and if he did need to have it legalized it was not his name before and all acts of his prior to this are void. Here we have a man who married under a false name, voted and was voted for under a false name, sat in the Legislature, voted on measures and signed laws under a false name; and thus has been a veritable, living, breathing fraud on the people of the Territory for nearly twenty years. And now comes and modestly asks from the people of this Territory the most important trust in their gift!
Signed, "Veritas." [def.: truth or true colors] (A Republican)
Schoolteacher Isabelle Eldridge |
Dear JohnThe next document in the file confirms that John Munro was sure enough honored at the 33rd Old Settlers Picnic in Ferndale:
Can you tell me when you got here from England? If I remember right it was the Fall of '72 that we went to the Fair at Olympia and you and Braiden [sp??] were there. You were here the year before so that would make it 1871. You came back from Olympia and staid at our house while Mother and the girls were at Frisco. I want to see who is to get the pioneer cup next year. Your cousin, Hugh Eldridge
This year's recipient of Oldest Settler's Cup John Monroe, pioneer, who will receive Oldest Settler's Cup, keeps faith with wife who lies beneath favorite lilac. Son in Tacoma wants father to spend his remaining days in city, but Marietta earlycomer, on 11-acre patch, answers silent prayer from beneath lilac. John Monroe, 76, will not leave his eleven-acre farm at Marietta because his wife is buried there under her favorite lilac tree. It was her wish that she be buried under the tree she used to sit beneath and do fancywork. If the pioneer moves to Tacoma to be with one of his two sons, the body of his life's companion would have to be removed.
Bellingham Herald, July 22, 1928.
For those not familiar with the various early towns on Bellingham Bay, the original smaller townsite of Bellingham was based on part of the claim of William Pattle, an Englishman employed by the Hudson's Bay Company, who came to the Bay in October 1852 after Indians told him about "black fire dirt" they discovered near where the Chrysallis Inn stands today, north of Fairhaven.Lynden Pioneer Press, May 22, 1890 The largest real estate deal ever recorded in Whatcom County took place on the Bay last week. Erastus Bartlett and Mr. Eldridge sold the Bellingham townsite to the Bellingham Bay company for $1,000,000. The property was placed on sale Monday morning and $250,000 worth sold that day.
John J. Edens, Isabelle's husband |
Top: original Eldridge 1853 cabin, photographed in 1889, courtesy of Fourth Corner; Center: 1891 Eldridge Mansion; Bottom: 1939 Hugh Eldridge Mansion, courtesy of City of Bellingham
|
|
|
|
|
Would you like information about how to join them? Please let us show you residential and commercial property in Sedro-Woolley and Skagit County 2204 Riverside Drive, Mount Vernon, Washington . . . 360 708-8935 . . . 360 708-1729 Oliver Hammer Clothes Shop at 817 Metcalf Street in downtown Sedro-Woolley, 86 years. Joy's Sedro-Woolley Bakery-Cafe at 823 Metcalf Street in downtown Sedro-Woolley. Check out Sedro-Woolley First section for links to all stories and reasons to shop here first or make this your destination on your visit or vacation. Are you looking to buy or sell a historic property, business or residence? We may be able to assist. Email us for details. Peace and quiet at the Alpine RV Park, just north of Marblemount on Hwy 20 Park your RV or pitch a tent by the Skagit River, just a short drive from Winthrop or Sedro-Woolley |
|
Tip: Put quotation marks around a specific name or item of two words or more, and then experiment with different combinations of the words without quote marks. We are currently researching some of the names most recently searched for — check the list here. Maybe you have searched for one of them? |
|
View My Guestbook Sign My Guestbook |
Mail copies/documents to Street address: Skagit River Journal, 810 Central Ave., Sedro-Woolley, WA, 98284. |