|
Skagit River JournalSubscribers Edition, where 450 of 700 stories originate The most in-depth, comprehensive site about the Skagit Covers from British Columbia to Puget Sound. Counties covered: Skagit, Whatcom, Island, San Juan, Snohomish & BC. An evolving history dedicated to committing random acts of historical kindness |
Home of the Tarheel Stomp Mortimer Cook slept here & named the town Bug |
|
The home pages remain free of any charge. We need donations or subscriptions to continue. Please pass on this website link to your family, relatives, friends and clients. |
|
We unfortunately have never found a photo of Bradsberry or his logging camps. But this one from Jesse B. Ball's camp in Sterling will certainly illustrate what logging was like when Frank arrived in 1884 and soon went to work for Ball. Oxen were used for logging then and fetched as much as $2,000 for a yoke, at least well into the hundreds. Many of the best logs along the shore of the Skagit river had been felled already, so camps were moving inland. The raw logs, some 70 feet long and longer, needed to be dragged to the river shore where they could be rafted downriver or pulled by sternwheeler steamboats, such as the Black Prince. When the distances were too far or when they wanted more speed, loggers would switch to horses. All this meant a large market for feed for the animals of burden, so agriculture in the county grew along with logging. We hope a reader can share a scan or copy of the family or logging photos that will help illustrate this article and others. |
Any time, any amount, please help build our travel and research fund for what promises to be a very busy 2011, traveling to mine resources from California to Washington and maybe beyond. Depth of research determined by the level of aid from readers. Because of our recent illness, our research fund is completely bare. See many examples of how you can aid our project and help us continue for another ten years. And subscriptions to our optional Subscribers Online Magazine (launched 2000) by donation too. Thank you. |
I wish to make a complete statement in regard to the matter to your paper," said Mr. Bradsberry, "and wish that you would take careful notes so that what I have to say will be presented accurately to the public.
Hammack's first public speech against me was made at the Beaver school house. In his talk, which was very bitter, he accused me of being the father of the corroborative evidence bill and working for it, voting for it, and doing everything possible to assist its passage. A few days after making the speech, Hammack came to me in Sedro-Woolley of his volition and stated that he was sorry that he had said what he had, and that he would fight me no longer.
Of his own free will he admitted that he knew he had misrepresented me, knowing as he did that I had neither worked nor voted for the bill, and said that he wanted to shake hands and 'call it off.' He stated that he had been forced into the fight against me by the Civic League, which, he said, and told him that he could not look for its support if he did not speak against me. To stand in the good graces of the League, he had made the untruthful remarks, but excused himself on the grounds that he was not in a position to do otherwise.
I told Mr. Hammack that he could go ahead and say anything he liked; that I would prefer to have him tell the truth, but that he could lie if he liked to. I said, furthermore, that I did not believe that the Civic League or any other body of supposedly honorable men would ask him to make use of falsehoods in an attempt to defeat a candidate of opposite political belief.
I asked him what his position on the corroboratory evidence bill was and he replied that "as a whole" he thought the bill was 'all right for the public, but not a good one for the lawyers, as under it there could not be so many damage cases.' after some further talk he reiterated his willingness to say nothing more against me in the campaign.
Since then Hammack has made speeches at both Edison and Anacortes more bitter, if anything, against me, and more untruthful, than the Beaver speech. After he had spoken at the latter place I met him and said, "Well, you raked me over, didn't you?" 'Yes,' he said, 'I had to do it! You didn't use me right. You told the people of the promise I had made not to fight you any more, and when the committee heard of it they forced me to go back on what I had said.' I do not know what committee he referred to, but those are substantially his exact words.
Now, I have just this to say in regard to the corroborative evidence bill: I introduced the document at the request of Judge Loomis of Bellingham, but neither worked for it, nor voted for it. As everyone is aware that knows anything about the legislature, it is a common thing to introduce a bill, 'by request,' without, however, giving it your support. The bill in question was championed in the house by Rev. Lee Johnson of Yakima, who made the speech for it and it was passed by a large margin. I neither WORKED for the bill at any time, nor VOTED for it, as Mr. Hammack admitted privately to me was the facts. Rev. Lee Johnson, the man who made the speech in favor of the bill, was the chief champion of the local option bill.
When Mr. Hammack makes the statements to the public that I supported the corroborative evidence bill, worked for it, and was largely instrumental in having it passed, he lies. I say that without heat, Mr. Mr. Hammack knows that he lies, having admitted as much to me as I have told. I have not entered into the merits of the bill, because that is not the matter under discussion; I will only state that the records will show that nearly all the best men in the house voted for it to become a law. As regards my own part, I will only say that Mr. Hammack in his speeches is both unfair and untruthful, and I am perfectly willing to leave the matter in the hands of the fair minded and unprejudiced voters of the county.
Well, it worked. He won renomination and served out his second term, after having rubbed shoulders with the political powers in the county, including his fellow representatives for the terms, Charles E. Gaches, Henry Hurshman, John O. Rudene and Nels Anderson.
Read how to sort through our 700-plus stories. |
|||
|
|
|
|
debuted on Aug. 9, 2009. Check it out. |
Would you like information about how to join them in advertising? Oliver-Hammer Clothes Shop at 817 Metcalf Street in downtown Sedro-Woolley, 90 years continually in business. Peace and quiet at the Alpine RV Park, just north of Marblemount on Hwy 20, day, week or month, perfect for hunting or fishing. Park your RV or pitch a tent — for as little as $5 per night — by the Skagit River, just a short drive from Winthrop or Sedro-Woolley. Alpine is doubling in capacity for RVs and camping in 2011. Joy's Sedro-Woolley Bakery-Cafe at 823 Metcalf Street in downtown Sedro-Woolley. Check out Sedro-Woolley First section for links to all stories and reasons to shop here first or make this your destination on your visit or vacation. Are you looking to buy or sell a historic property, business or residence? We may be able to assist. Email us for details. |
|
Tip: Put quotation marks around a specific name or item of two words or more, and then experiment with different combinations of the words without quote marks. We are currently researching some of the names most recently searched for — check the list here. Maybe you have searched for one of them? |
|
View My Guestbook Sign My Guestbook |
Mail copies/documents to Street address: Skagit River Journal, 810 Central Ave., Sedro-Woolley, WA, 98284. |